Doctrinal and Strategic Influences of the Chief Justice the Decisional Significance of the Chief Justice
نویسندگان
چکیده
The office of the Chief Justice of the United States has received considerable renown but has been the subject of relatively little research. It is common to refer to the Chief as primus inter pares, but little attention has been paid to the relative significance of the primus as opposed to the pares. The office of the Chief Justice has been considered “second in national authority and prestige only to the president,” and is said to have “sweeping, if usually unstated, powers and significance.” Yet the Chief Justice has relatively little actual authority over the Associate Justices who serve contemporaneously, and the “fact that a chief justice must work his will with eight independent souls not chosen by him is a formidable barrier to his success.” Justice Frankfurter described the Supreme Court as an “institution in which every man is his own sovereign.” More colorfully, thenAssociate Justice Rehnquist referred to Associate Justices as being “as independent as hogs on ice.” Thus, the actual influence of the Chief
منابع مشابه
Information Systems Leadership Roles: An Empirical Study of Information Technology Managers in Norway
Information systems (IS) leadership roles have undergone fundamental changes over the past decade. Despite increased interest in recent years, little empirical research on IS managers has been done. This article presents results from a survey in Norway. The survey collected data on general leadership roles such as informational role, decisional role and interpersonal role, as well as on specifi...
متن کاملThe Internal Powers of the Chief Justice: the Nineteenth-century Legacy
The literature on the role of the Chief Justice of the United States has been dominated by two stereotypes. One, perpetuated by Chief Justices themselves and generally endorsed by other Justices, is that the Chief Justice occupies the role of “first among equals,” meaning that the powers of the Chief are largely formal, such as personifying the Court as an institution, as opposed to substantive...
متن کاملChief Justice Rehnquist’s Appointments to the Fisa Court: an Empirical Perspective
INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 239 I. BACKGROUND ON THE FISA COURT AND THE CHIEF JUSTICE’S APPOINTMENT POWERS ............................................................................................................... 243 II. METHODOLOGICAL CHOICES ........................................................
متن کامل“advice and Consent” in the Appointments Clause: from Another Historical Perspective
The sharply contrasting experiences of John G. Roberts, Jr. and William Howard Taft with the Article II, Section 2 appointments process illustrate that the long view of history is governed by perspective. William Howard Taft, the twenty-seventh President, also later became the tenth Chief Justice of the United States. Taft was nominated for the position of Chief Justice of the Supreme Court—a p...
متن کامل" Some Kind of Hearing " *
It was particularly affecting to be invited to give the Owen J. Roberts lecture at this law school, of which my father-in-law, Chief Justice Horace Stern of Pennsylvania, was a distinguished graduate, a part-time teacher and a long-time trustee. The honor accorded me is even greater in that this is the hundredth anniversary of Justice Roberts' birth. Although I did not have the good fortune to ...
متن کامل